Skip to content
PlanningLedger

Bridgend County Borough Council planning applications

Data as of 5 November 2026

Bridgend County Borough Council decided more than 700 planning applications in the twelve months to 5 November 2026. It refused 8% of those it approved or refused, about the same as the middle UK council (9%), and took a median of 88 days to decide one.

Look up one application

Search by reference or address on Bridgend County Borough Council’s own planning portal. Or ask Claude, with the PlanningLedger connector, to find it and read its officer report and decision notice (mcp.planningledger.com).

Recent major decisions

Figures for Bridgend County Borough Council

Decisions: the twelve months to 5 November 2026, from Bridgend County Borough Council’s published planning register. Appeals: decided from 6 November 2023 to 5 November 2026, from the appeal body’s casework.
Applications decided more than 700
Share refusedof those approved or refused 8%middle UK council 9%
Median time to a decisionfrom the valid date 88 daysmiddle UK council 55 days
Householder applications refusedextensions, lofts, outbuildings Not enough typed decisions
Appeals decidedin the last three years 56
Appeals allowedof those decided on their merits 18%about one in five
Officer reports and decision notices searchable back to 2023
Local Plan policies held 75plan adopted 2024

What inspectors decide appeals on

In their own words, from recent appeal decisions on Bridgend County Borough Council’s planning applications.

  • “The main issues are: • whether the proposal conflicts with national and local policies designed to protect the countryside and promote sustainable development, • the effect of the proposal on the Hendre Uchaf Site of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC)…”

    Dismissed, 2023

  • “The main issue in this case is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the countryside.”

    Dismissed, 2019

  • “The main issues are: (i) whether the proposed dwelling would provide acceptable living conditions for future occupiers, particularly in terms of privacy and any visual impact; and (ii) the effect of the proposed development on highway safety.”

    Allowed, 2018

  • “The main issues are: Whether the proposal is inappropriate development in the green wedge and, if so, its effect on openness. Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as…”

    Dismissed, 2018

  • “The main issues in this case are the location of the site largely outside the settlement boundary, the effects of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, and whether or not allowing the development would set…”

    Dismissed, 2017

How we count, and what each figure leaves out: methodology. The council’s own register is the record, and each application links to it.