Skip to content
PlanningLedger

Caerphilly County Borough Council planning applications

Data as of 5 November 2026

Caerphilly County Borough Council decided more than 750 planning applications in the twelve months to 5 November 2026. It refused 18% of those it approved or refused, higher than the middle UK council (9%), and took a median of 53 days to decide one.

Look up one application

Search by reference or address on Caerphilly County Borough Council’s own planning portal. Or ask Claude, with the PlanningLedger connector, to find it and read its officer report and decision notice (mcp.planningledger.com).

Recent major decisions

Figures for Caerphilly County Borough Council

Decisions: the twelve months to 5 November 2026, from Caerphilly County Borough Council’s published planning register. Appeals: decided from 6 November 2023 to 5 November 2026, from the appeal body’s casework.
Applications decided more than 750
Share refusedof those approved or refused 18%middle UK council 9%
Median time to a decisionfrom the valid date 53 daysmiddle UK council 55 days
Householder applications refusedextensions, lofts, outbuildings 23%of more than 180 decided
Appeals decidedin the last three years 92
Appeals allowedof those decided on their merits 31%about one in three
Officer reports and decision notices searchable back to 2017
Local Plan policies held Not held yet

What inspectors decide appeals on

In their own words, from recent appeal decisions on Caerphilly County Borough Council’s planning applications.

  • “The main issues in this case are: • Whether the development is acceptable in principle, having particular regard to the planning policy framework set at both a local and national level; • Whether the development would be acceptable in terms…”

    Dismissed, 2020

  • “The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring and future residents with particular regard to privacy and outlook.”

    Dismissed, 2019

  • “The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to visual impact.”

    Dismissed, 2017

How we count, and what each figure leaves out: methodology. The council’s own register is the record, and each application links to it.