Skip to content
PlanningLedger

Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council planning applications

Data as of 5 November 2026

Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council decided more than 1,300 planning applications in the twelve months to 5 November 2026. It refused 15% of those it approved or refused, higher than the middle UK council (9%), and took a median of 56 days to decide one.

Look up one application

Search by reference or address on Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council’s own planning portal. Or ask Claude, with the PlanningLedger connector, to find it and read its officer report and decision notice (mcp.planningledger.com).

Recent major decisions

Figures for Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council

Decisions: the twelve months to 5 November 2026, from Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council’s published planning register. Appeals: decided from 6 November 2023 to 5 November 2026, from the appeal body’s casework.
Applications decided more than 1,300
Share refusedof those approved or refused 15%middle UK council 9%
Median time to a decisionfrom the valid date 56 daysmiddle UK council 55 days
Householder applications refusedextensions, lofts, outbuildings Not enough typed decisions
Appeals decidedin the last three years more than 210
Appeals allowedof those decided on their merits 15%about one in six
Officer reports and decision notices searchable back to 2017
Local Plan policies held more than 120plan adopted 2023

What inspectors decide appeals on

In their own words, from recent appeal decisions on Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council’s planning applications.

  • “The Council’s decision refers to ‘over-development’ of the site and the proposed development being ‘overbearing to surrounding properties’. For the purposes of this appeal, I have interpreted the former as being the effect of the proposed development and the latter…”

    Dismissed, 2025

  • “The main issues of the appeal are: • whether the proposed development constitutes inappropriate development within the Green Belt and, if so: • The effect on the openness and purposes of the Green Belt; • The effect of the proposed…”

    Dismissed, 2025

  • “The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on flood risk.”

    Dismissed, 2023

  • “The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on highway safety.”

    Dismissed, 2023

  • “The main issues are; (i) The effect of the proposed development on the setting of Henshaw Farm, a Grade II listed building, and; (ii) The effect of the proposed development on highway safety.”

    Dismissed, 2021

How we count, and what each figure leaves out: methodology. The council’s own register is the record, and each application links to it.