Cardiff Council planning applications
Data as of 5 November 2026
Cardiff Council decided more than 2,400 planning applications in the twelve months to 5 November 2026. It refused 5% of those it approved or refused, lower than the middle UK council (9%), and took a median of 55 days to decide one.
Look up one application
Search by reference or address on Cardiff Council’s own planning portal. Or ask Claude, with the PlanningLedger connector, to find it and read its officer report and decision notice (mcp.planningledger.com).
Recent major decisions
-
21 August 2026 · Refused
The Salvation Army May Street Cathays Cardiff CF24 4EX · 25/02219/FUL
-
17 August 2026 · Approved
City Square At Former Debenhams Site 46 - 50 St Davids Way Cathays Cardiff CF10 2UF · 26/00782/FUL
-
14 August 2026 · Approved
Phase 6A Of Land North Of Junction 33 Creigiau Cardiff · 25/02764/RES
-
31 July 2026 · Approved
Former Ely Housing Office Site Land At The Junction Of Pendine Road/Grand Avenue Ely Cardiff CF5 4BL · 26/00577/FUL
-
22 July 2026 · Approved
Wolfs Castle Inn Wolfs Castle Avenue Llanishen Cardiff CF14 5JS · 26/00493/FUL
Figures for Cardiff Council
| Applications decided | more than 2,400 |
|---|---|
| Share refusedof those approved or refused | 5%middle UK council 9% |
| Median time to a decisionfrom the valid date | 55 daysmiddle UK council 55 days |
| Householder applications refusedextensions, lofts, outbuildings | 6%of more than 640 decided |
| Appeals decidedin the last three years | 100 |
| Appeals allowedof those decided on their merits | 25%about one in four |
| Officer reports and decision notices searchable | back to 2017 |
| Local Plan policies held | 150plan adopted 2016 |
What inspectors decide appeals on
In their own words, from recent appeal decisions on Cardiff Council’s planning applications.
-
“The main issue in this case is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.”
-
“Against the background that I have described, the main issues are: • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area, including whether it preserves or enhances the character and appearance of the adjacent…”
-
“In light of the above, I consider that the main issue in this appeal is whether the proposal would be an appropriate form of development in this location, having regard to relevant development plan policies and any other material considerations.”
-
“The main issue is the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.”
How we count, and what each figure leaves out: methodology. The council’s own register is the record, and each application links to it.