Skip to content
PlanningLedger

East Hampshire District Council planning applications

Data as of 5 November 2026

East Hampshire District Council decided more than 1,100 planning applications in the twelve months to 5 November 2026. It refused 9% of those it approved or refused, about the same as the middle UK council (9%), and took a median of 74 days to decide one.

Look up one application

Search by reference or address on East Hampshire District Council’s own planning portal. Or ask Claude, with the PlanningLedger connector, to find it and read its officer report and decision notice (mcp.planningledger.com).

Figures for East Hampshire District Council

Decisions: the twelve months to 5 November 2026, from East Hampshire District Council’s published planning register. Appeals: decided from 6 November 2023 to 5 November 2026, from the appeal body’s casework.
Applications decided more than 1,100
Share refusedof those approved or refused 9%middle UK council 9%
Median time to a decisionfrom the valid date 74 daysmiddle UK council 55 days
Householder applications refusedextensions, lofts, outbuildings 6%of more than 300 decided
Appeals decidedin the last three years 110
Appeals allowedof those decided on their merits 32%about one in three
Officer reports and decision notices searchable back to 2017
Local Plan policies held 50plan adopted 2016

What inspectors decide appeals on

In their own words, from recent appeal decisions on East Hampshire District Council’s planning applications.

  • “The main issues are: • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area; and • whether it has been demonstrated that the proposal would be acceptable with respect to its impact on biodiversity.”

    Dismissed, 2026

  • “In light of this and the submissions, the main issues are: • whether the appeal site is a suitable location for the appeal scheme having regard to the development plan and the appeal site’s proximity to services and facilities; •…”

    Dismissed, 2026

  • “The main issues are: • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area; • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the occupiers of The Former Rectory, with particular regard…”

    Dismissed, 2023

  • “The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the local landscape and countryside.”

    Allowed, 2023

  • “The main issue is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the surrounding countryside.”

    Allowed, 2022

How we count, and what each figure leaves out: methodology. The council’s own register is the record, and each application links to it.