North East Derbyshire District Council planning applications
Data as of 5 November 2026
North East Derbyshire District Council decided more than 900 planning applications in the twelve months to 5 November 2026. It refused 9% of those it approved or refused, about the same as the middle UK council (9%), and took a median of 56 days to decide one.
Look up one application
Search by reference or address on North East Derbyshire District Council’s own planning portal. Or ask Claude, with the PlanningLedger connector, to find it and read its officer report and decision notice (mcp.planningledger.com).
Recent major decisions
-
27 October 2026 · Approved
Application for Storage ,Warehousing and Manufacturing (Major Development)(Amended Title)
Land On The Northern Corner Of Upper Mantle Close Clay Cross · 25/00435/MFL
-
25 September 2026 · Approved
Land North Of 62 Church Street Eckington · 26/00481/RM
-
10 September 2026 · Approved
Land To The South Of Hallfieldgate Lane Shirland · 23/00947/RM
-
24 July 2026 · Approved
Ford Valley Farm Ford Road Marsh Lane Sheffield S21 5RE · 24/00377/FL
Figures for North East Derbyshire District Council
| Applications decided | more than 900 |
|---|---|
| Share refusedof those approved or refused | 9%middle UK council 9% |
| Median time to a decisionfrom the valid date | 56 daysmiddle UK council 55 days |
| Householder applications refusedextensions, lofts, outbuildings | Not enough typed decisions |
| Appeals decidedin the last three years | more than 100 |
| Appeals allowedof those decided on their merits | 25%about one in four |
| Officer reports and decision notices searchable | back to 2017 |
| Local Plan policies held | 110plan adopted 2021 |
What inspectors decide appeals on
In their own words, from recent appeal decisions on North East Derbyshire District Council’s planning applications.
-
“It is considered that the main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.”
-
“The main issues are: - Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt; - The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area and landscape; - The effect of the proposal on…”
-
“The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.”
-
“The main issues of the appeal are: • The effect of the proposal on biodiversity, • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (Framework) and any relevant development…”
-
“The main issues are: • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including any effect on openness, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework (‘the Framework’) (2023) and any relevant development plan policies; •…”
How we count, and what each figure leaves out: methodology. The council’s own register is the record, and each application links to it.