Skip to content
PlanningLedger

Oadby and Wigston Borough Council planning applications

Data as of 5 November 2026

Oadby and Wigston Borough Council decided 400 planning applications in the twelve months to 5 November 2026. It refused 27% of those it approved or refused, higher than the middle UK council (9%), and took a median of 55 days to decide one.

Look up one application

Search by reference or address on Oadby and Wigston Borough Council’s own planning portal. Or ask Claude, with the PlanningLedger connector, to find it and read its officer report and decision notice (mcp.planningledger.com).

Figures for Oadby and Wigston Borough Council

Decisions: the twelve months to 5 November 2026, from Oadby and Wigston Borough Council’s published planning register. Appeals: decided from 6 November 2023 to 5 November 2026, from the appeal body’s casework.
Applications decided 400
Share refusedof those approved or refused 27%middle UK council 9%
Median time to a decisionfrom the valid date 55 daysmiddle UK council 55 days
Householder applications refusedextensions, lofts, outbuildings Not enough typed decisions
Appeals decidedin the last three years 44
Appeals allowedof those decided on their merits 31%about one in three
Officer reports and decision notices searchable back to 2017
Local Plan policies held 47plan adopted 2019

What inspectors decide appeals on

In their own words, from recent appeal decisions on Oadby and Wigston Borough Council’s planning applications.

  • “The main issues are: • whether the proposal would meet an identified need for children’s residential care facilities in the Borough. • the effect of the proposed development on the supply of family housing; and • the effect of the…”

    Allowed, 2026

  • “With the above in mind, the main issues are the effect of the proposed development on a) the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers with specific regard to noise disturbance and air quality; and b) highway safety.”

    Dismissed, 2022

  • “A main issue in both appeals is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area. With regard to Appeal A, there is an additional main issue relating to the effect of the development on the…”

    Dismissed, 2018

  • “The main issues are the effect of the proposed development on: the character and appearance of the area with particular regard to the security fence and vehicle parking protected trees whether the site is a suitable location for the proposed…”

    Dismissed, 2017

  • “The main issue in this appeal is the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area.”

    Allowed, 2017

How we count, and what each figure leaves out: methodology. The council’s own register is the record, and each application links to it.