Tandridge District Council planning applications
Data as of 5 November 2026
Tandridge District Council decided more than 1,400 planning applications in the twelve months to 5 November 2026. It refused 15% of those it approved or refused, higher than the middle UK council (9%), and took a median of 56 days to decide one.
Look up one application
Search by reference or address on Tandridge District Council’s own planning portal. Or ask Claude, with the PlanningLedger connector, to find it and read its officer report and decision notice (mcp.planningledger.com).
Recent major decisions
-
30 September 2026 · Approved
Rede Cottage, 57 Redehall Road, Smallfield, Horley, Surrey, RH6 9QA · 2024/1389
-
25 September 2026 · Approved
Land At Mount Avenue, Chaldon, CR3 5BB · 2025/771
-
24 August 2026 · Approved
Caterham School, Harestone Valley Road, Caterham, Surrey, CR3 6YA · 2025/992
-
23 July 2026 · Refused
Land North Of Chelsham Road, Warlingham, CR6 9DT · 2024/1325
-
17 July 2026 · Refused
Land At Thepps Close, South Nutfield, Redhill, RH1 5NX · 2025/1408
-
8 July 2026 · Approved
Land At Longsdon Way, Caterham, · 2025/413
Figures for Tandridge District Council
| Applications decided | more than 1,400 |
|---|---|
| Share refusedof those approved or refused | 15%middle UK council 9% |
| Median time to a decisionfrom the valid date | 56 daysmiddle UK council 55 days |
| Householder applications refusedextensions, lofts, outbuildings | 9%of 450 decided |
| Appeals decidedin the last three years | more than 270 |
| Appeals allowedof those decided on their merits | 36%about one in three |
| Officer reports and decision notices searchable | back to 2017 |
| Local Plan policies held | more than 100plan adopted 2008 |
What inspectors decide appeals on
In their own words, from recent appeal decisions on Tandridge District Council’s planning applications.
-
“The main issues are: • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt; • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area; • Whether acceptable living conditions would be created for…”
-
“The main issues are: • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the surrounding area; and • the effect of the proposed development on biodiversity and protected species.”
-
“The main issues are: • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework 2024 (the Framework) and any relevant development plan policies. • The effect of the proposal on…”
-
“The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on playing field provision.”
-
“The main issues in this appeal are: • The effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area; • The effect of the proposed development upon the living conditions of surrounding residents, in particular from loss…”
How we count, and what each figure leaves out: methodology. The council’s own register is the record, and each application links to it.