City of Westminster planning applications
Data as of 5 November 2026
City of Westminster decided more than 8,700 planning applications in the twelve months to 5 November 2026. It refused 12% of those it approved or refused, higher than the middle UK council (9%), and took a median of 56 days to decide one.
Look up one application
Search by reference or address on City of Westminster’s own planning portal. Or ask Claude, with the PlanningLedger connector, to find it and read its officer report and decision notice (mcp.planningledger.com).
Recent major decisions
-
16 October 2026 · Approved
95 - 99 Lancaster Gate London W2 3NS · 25/02470/FULL
-
9 October 2026 · Approved
Cavell House 2A Charing Cross Road London WC2H 0HF · 26/04795/FULL
-
18 September 2026 · Approved
Windsor House 50 Victoria Street London SW1H 0TL · 26/01445/FULL
-
17 September 2026 · Approved
64 Wimpole Street London W1G 8YS · 26/01740/FULL
-
3 September 2026 · Approved
206 - 216 Marylebone Road London NW1 6JQ · 24/03776/FULL
-
26 August 2026 · Approved
349 - 351 Edgware Road London W2 1BS · 23/08474/FULL
Figures for City of Westminster
| Applications decided | more than 8,700 |
|---|---|
| Share refusedof those approved or refused | 12%middle UK council 9% |
| Median time to a decisionfrom the valid date | 56 daysmiddle UK council 55 days |
| Householder applications refusedextensions, lofts, outbuildings | 18%of more than 410 decided |
| Appeals decidedin the last three years | more than 380 |
| Appeals allowedof those decided on their merits | 34%about one in three |
| Officer reports and decision notices searchable | back to 2017 |
| Local Plan policies held | 50plan adopted 2026 |
What inspectors decide appeals on
In their own words, from recent appeal decisions on City of Westminster’s planning applications.
-
“The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the housing supply within the area.”
-
“Accordingly, the main issues are: • whether the proposed development is permitted development in accordance with Class A, Part 16, Sch.2 of the GPDO, and if so, • the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed development on…”
-
“The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on pedestrian safety.”
-
“The main issue is the effect of the siting and appearance of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.”
-
“The main issue is the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.”
How we count, and what each figure leaves out: methodology. The council’s own register is the record, and each application links to it.