Skip to content
PlanningLedger

Householder decision speed

London boroughs ranked by householder decision speed, 12 months to 1 November 2026. Median days to decide a householder application (statutory target: 56 days). Boroughs with fewer than 20 decisions aren’t ranked.

Householder decision speed, London boroughs ranked
Rank Borough Householder decision speed Decided (12 months)
1 Redbridge 45 days 2,798
2 Richmond upon Thames 50 days 3,197
3 Barking and Dagenham 52 days 553
4 Enfield 52 days 3,941
5 Southwark 52 days 3,286
6 Sutton 54 days 1,677
7 Waltham Forest 55 days 1,915
8 Barnet 56 days 4,488
9 Bexley 56 days 2,075
10 Brent 56 days 1,395
11 Croydon 56 days 3,057
12 Greenwich 56 days 2,424
13 Hackney 56 days 2,295
14 Haringey 56 days 2,231
15 Harrow 56 days 1,729
16 Havering 56 days 2,313
17 Hillingdon 56 days 2,465
18 Hounslow 56 days 2,395
19 Kingston upon Thames 56 days 2,531
20 Lambeth 56 days 3,204
21 Lewisham 56 days 1,771
22 Newham 56 days 2,362
23 Tower Hamlets 56 days 1,519
24 Wandsworth 56 days 3,690
25 Ealing 59 days 3,692
26 Merton 64 days 1,320
27 Islington 65 days 2,225
28 Camden 66 days 1,351
29 Hammersmith and Fulham 72 days 1,270
30 Westminster 100 days 8,465
31 Kensington and Chelsea 160 days 881

Not ranked

We don’t rank a borough whose published planning data has fewer than 20 relevant decisions in the window, or, for approval rates, one that records no refusals at all across 100 or more decisions: that means we can’t yet read how the council words its decisions.

London planning, weekly

The Weekly Approvals Digest: the week’s notable approvals, borough by borough. Free; unsubscribe any time.

Figures computed from decided planning applications published by each borough: the October 2026 snapshot, computed 10 October 2026. Coverage: 33 London planning authorities. A borough with fewer than 20 decisions in the window is shown as “too few decisions” rather than ranked, and one that records no refusals across 100 or more decisions is left unranked until we can read its decision wording. See the methodology.